Bach NY 11A

Post Reply
Rusty
Posts: 367
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2018 6:30 am

Bach NY 11A

Post by Rusty »

Anyone played one of these? I’m assuming it’s shallower than an 11c?
User avatar
BGuttman
Posts: 6495
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:19 am
Location: Cow Hampshire

Re: Bach NY 11A

Post by BGuttman »

Actually it's deeper. E is the shallowest cup and A is the deepest. No letter is B. Note that this only applies to the original Bach mouthpieces. G generally refers to the drill used for the aperture. Note also that AL is not a very deep mouthpiece but instead a "custom model" which seemed to be a great general purpose mouthpiece.

11A was probably intended for small shank baritone horns.
Bruce Guttman
Merrimack Valley Philharmonic Orchestra
"Almost Professional"
SteveM
Posts: 70
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 5:30 pm
Location: Anacortes WA

Re: Bach NY 11A

Post by SteveM »

BGuttman wrote: Tue Feb 01, 2022 5:02 am Actually it's deeper. E is the shallowest cup and A is the deepest. No letter is B. Note that this only applies to the original Bach mouthpieces. G generally refers to the drill used for the aperture. Note also that AL is not a very deep mouthpiece but instead a "custom model" which seemed to be a great general purpose mouthpiece.
Actually, the tenor trombone mouthpieces with no letter designation can be either A or B. The older Bach mouthpiece manuals make it clear that "A" mouthpieces are "Medium Deep" and "B"s are "Medium". All the non-letter mouthpieces are described as either "Medium Deep" or "Medium", and they fall into the following two groups (listing only through 15):

"A"/"Medium Deep"
3, 6 1/2, 9, 11, 15

"B"/"Medium"
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12

The 6 1/2 is truly a "Medium Deep" cup. Bach probably used the 6 1/2 AL to avoid calling it "6 1/2 L", which would have been confusing.

Originally G designated a "Deep", or Bass Trombone cup (which was accompanied by a larger throat and backbore).

I would guess that the 11A in question is no different from an 11. Since it is a NY model, Bach may not yet have settled on leaving out the letters for A and B cups.
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 4361
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Bach NY 11A

Post by Matt K »

What I love about Bach's nomenclature is its so clear what all of it means.
User avatar
spencercarran
Posts: 655
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 1:02 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Bach NY 11A

Post by spencercarran »

Matt K wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 12:54 pm What I love about Bach's nomenclature is its so clear what all of it means.
Clear nomenclature and a Teutonic tone quality, what more could you want?

What really weirds me out is how (at least according to published spec) the 11C is nearly identical to 7C, while the 6 3/4C is much further away from 7C.
Post Reply

Return to “Mouthpieces”